The Erdös Number Project
An Erdös Number of 1 is awarded to a researcher who has joined in one publication
with the outstanding mathematician Paul Erdös(1913-1996).
There are 507 such researchers, in fact 201 of them wrote two (or more) publications with Erdös.
Likewise, joint publication with someone with an Erdös Number of 1, yields an Erdös
Number of 2. Currently, there are 6419 reported Erdös Number 2 individuals.
And so on.
Paul Erdös circa 1980
The official Erdös Number Project
computes Erdös Numbers only via a path through papers eligible for citation in
a professional journal.
The compilers of The Erdös Number Project Extended take a more generous perspective, and extend the concept of
the Erdös Number to become the Erdös Number embodying a wider and deeper range of collaboration.
These web pages constitute our FAQ on the Erdös Number,
just who or what is eligible, the youngest, oldest, and most fabjous awardees.
In fact, fiction, animal, mineral, vegetable, or in the spiritual realm.
How is an Erdös Number computed ?
The key idea is that there has to be a path of joint publications,
linking the awardee with Paul Erdös.
The Erdös Number is the smallest number of links connecting a (joint)
paper of the awardee with Paul Erdös.
A full formal definition can be given using Graph Theory,
but the idea is simple enough, to be explained by a simple example.
Alexander Zeno Cohen acquired an Erdös Number of four via the following path:
To recap what's immediately above: Starting from the classic Erdös Wintner paper, for which Wintner
acquired a Erdös number of 1;
an Analyse Math paper with Wintner sets Sternberg's Erdös number =2;
while Quillen's collarative effort with Sternberg (and Guillemin) made his Erdös Number =3.
In the case of Alexander Zeno Cohen, we need to note that invariably press articles re mathematicians
were first written by the mathematicians themselves, then revised by journalists enroute to the presses.
In this case the article re Quillen et al, has been typographically joined with the pictorial saga of Alexander's
exercise in fluid dynamics, to justify the assignment of the Extended Erdös Number of 4
to Alexander. (See below for pix and the actual publication)
- Erdos, Paul; Wintner, Aurel. Additive arithmetical functions and
statistical independence. Amer. J. Math. 61, (1939). 713--721.
- Sternberg, Shlomo; Wintner, Aurel On a class of analogies between
differential equations and implicit equations. J. Analyse Math. 5 (1956/57), 34--46.
- Guillemin, Victor W.; Quillen, Daniel; Sternberg, Shlomo. The
integrability of characteristics. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 23 no. 1 (1970), 39--77.
- "American Academy Elects Quillen, Wunsch and Brown", TechTalk Vol 23 No 35 p1 May
16, 1979 -- including the pix to which Alexander contributed.
This publication would not be acceptable for the Official Erdös Number
What it Means: Close Distances from the Greats
For a mathematician, the Erdös Number essentially measires how mainstream one is.
It certainly is the case that Paul Erdös pulled above his weight with his voluminous list of publications.
But it is NOT the case that twentieth Century maths was primarily inspired by Paul Erdös.
Rather it is the case that the social community of Mathematics researchers are linked by joint papers,
and there are just a few links separating any two researchers active in the Twentith Century.
The compiler of this page trained as a mathematical physicist so has some links
to the mathematics community, leading to my unremarkable Erdös
number of 5. I was never a key mathematician. In fact very
many researchers of my vintage in a mathematically related discipline have an Erdös Number between 5 and 8.
But as I have just said, my primary early research was in mathematical physics:
and thus I do have short link numbers to several famous physicists. My shortest
Physicist Numbers are:
The point that low numbers (except one) do NOT necessarily indicate ay actual linkage in research,
is demonstrated by the fact that yours truly, with a Higgs Number of 2,
never published about the Higgs boson. whereas (my collaborator) Jack Smith - Higgs Number =1 -
circa 2003 published significant papers
related to the discovery of the Higgs boson.
See My Man in Stockholm.
- Higgs Number of 2 - through a joint paper with Jack Smith, who was the very first
student and collaborator with Peter Higgs.
the 2013 Nobel Prize winner. In papers published around 1967
Higgs predicted what is termed the Higgs boson.
See My Man in Stockholm.
- Schrodinger number of 3: Schrodinger with Heisenberg (my number is 4) developed the basics of Quantum Mechanics.
- Born Number of 3: Max Born was early worker in Quantum Mechanics who (especially) developed
the probabilistic interpretation.
- Number of 4 various famous physicists, including
Einstein, Pauli, Heisenberg, Oppenheimer, Weisskopf and Gerlach.
Who is The Youngest to Gain an Erdös Number?
To the left, Alexander Zeno Cohen, aged twenty months, with his father, using the 2-key (+ -) keypad for use with
the PLUSMINUS program, a Tiny Tots Calculator,
running on the Poly-88,
a 1976 microcomputer.
Alexander Zeno Cohen
was only two years and four months old yet within the MIT community
when a joint publication appeared which via the chain of publications ennumerated above
acquired him an
an Erdös Number of 4. (He was NOT three-years old as per the caption below.)
Alexander's precocity might be attributed to his exposure,
from the age of twelve months,
to the educational programs of the
which was the first educational robotics project that was microcomputer based.
With this background in
OZNAKI, Alexander Zeno Cohen, in 1979
researched fluid mechanics in the MIT pool,
along with the 1978 Field Medallist, Daniel Quillen, a professor of mathematics at MIT.
The ensuing joint publication in the MIT house newspaper, TechTalk, (reproduced below),
automatically gave Alexander an Erdöss Number of 4, just one more than Quillen's
Erdöss Number of 3.
Here is a copy of the joint publication:
Those who gain their knowledge of mathematics from that most reliable medium, the film,
will learn from Good Will Hunting that publication in MIT TechTalk is the absolute pinnacle of mathematical achievement,
if a little lower in stature than the actual award of a Fields Medal.
Thus Alexander had it made within mathematics by the very publication of his exploits on the front page of TechTalk --
but it was nice that MIT's latest Field Medallist could assist him in gaining a low Erdös Number .
More on Extended Erdos Numbers including some outrageous